Tag Archives: Saturday Night Live

Is This The Last Great Season For Derek Jeter?

19 Sep

Derek Jeter

Enjoy it now, Yankee fans.  This will be Derek Jeter’s last great season.

Growing up a non-Yankee fan in the New York area, nothing has grated at me more over the years than the intensity of the man crush that typical Yankee fans have on Derek Jeter.  It reminds me of those old SNL skits about the Chicago Bears fans who think that  “Da Bears” and Mike Dikta can do anything.  

Jeter can do no wrong in the eyes of love struck Yankee fans.  And the annoying thing to a Yankee hater like me is that on or off the field, it often seems true although to be fair he has at times failed in the clutch.

I’m a bit of a contrarian and nothing scares me more than group think, so I’ve had a hard time accepting the fact that Jeter is a such a special player to begin with.  For years I thought that he was an OK fielding, good hitting shortstop who won the career lottery by being able to play in New York.  And for years, I’ve patiently waited for Jeter’s inevitable decline.

Yes, Yankee fans, even Derek Jeter will tail off due to the passage of time.  He can’t play (at least at a high level) forever.

This season, Jeter is 35 and having a terrific year.  Annoyed by this, the only course of action available  to me was to tell myself that this HAD to be his last great year.

So, I started by taking a look at Hall of Fame shortstops.  It was then that I realized that there simply weren’t many who were comparable to Jeter, at least as a hitter.  For many years, baseball simply didn’t demand offense from the position.  Sure, you have Honus Wagner and some other all time greats from the very early days of the game who have huge offensive stats, but I didn’t feel like that was a fair comparison.

The three relatively modern players who seemed closest to Jeter as hitters were Ernie Banks, Robin Yount, and Cal Ripken.  Banks hit over 500 homers and clearly had way more power than Jeter or the rest.  Yount won two MVPs compared to none so far for Jeter.  And Ripken, we’ll it’s the streak that printed his ticket to Cooperstown, of course.

Feeling that Banks might not be the fairest of comparisons, I also decided to take a look at Barry Larkin.   Larkin played short as a fixture for the Reds for many years and has career numbers within shouting distance of Jeter.  Larkin may even end up in the Hall some day keeping Ripken and co company.

So let’s take a look at Jeter’s possible future by seeing what Banks, Yount, Ripken and Larkin managed to do at bat after hitting the age of 35.

As I noted earlier, Banks isn’t the best comparison.  For one, he had way more power than Jeter, but more significantly he stopped playing shortstop at 30.  From ages 33-36, Ernie Banks was still pretty much Ernie Banks as a hitter.  But at 37, he hit a wall.  He still had his power.  Hitting 32 homers as a 37 year old and 23 the next year, but his batting average took a dive.  His highest average from age 37 on was .253, which is about 20 points lower than his career average.  Banks finished out his career in 1971 getting in only 39 games as a 40 year old.  The year before, he’d played in 72 games.

Moving on to Yount, who I initially thought might be a better comparison to Jeter than Banks.  Only, it turns out Robin Yount was done at shortstop at age 28 despite winning an MVP at the position in 1982.  What jumped out at me about Yount, is that the two time MVP was out of the game at 37.  Jeter’s just two years from being 37.  For Yount, 1989 was his last great year.  He was 33 and it was the last of four straight .300 seasons.  At 34, Robin Yount dipped to .247 and never hit higher than .264 afterwards.

So what about Ripken?  The iron man’s last great season came in 1996 at the age of 35, which was also his last year at short.  Ripken hit 26 home runs while driving in 102 and batting .278.  Those may not seem like amazing numbers now, but from a historical prospective that’s a lot of offense from a presumably steroid-free shortstop.  In the next two years that followed, the games played streak went on, but in Ripken’s last three years he couldn’t stay on the field.  From age 38 to 40, he played 86, 53 and 128 games in each season.  Clearly, Ripken’s age had broken down the iron man.

Finally, we go to Barry Larkin.  Larkin may be the fairest comparison of all.  Larkin played only shortstop, like Jeter.  And like Derek Jeter presumable, Larkin only played for one club his entire career, the Cincinnati Reds.  Larkin’s last truly great year was in 2000 at the age of 36.  He batted .313 in the 102 games he played in.  The next year he played in 45 games.  At the age of 38 he played in 145.  In the final two years of his career while his batting average was within shouting distance of his career average, he played in only 70 and 111 games.  He was done at 40.

So, what conclusions can we draw?  A few, I think. 

First, Derek Jeter is a pretty unique guy.  Not even some of the contemporary greats like Banks, Yount and Ripken managed to last at shortstop as long as he has.  Derek Jeter belongs in the Hall of Fame. 

Second, Barry Larkin is way more like Derek Jeter than I realized.  Imagine if he’d played in New York…

Third, as you get older it gets tougher to stay on the field.  Yount was done at 37.  The others all went on way beyond that.  Banks, Ripken and Larkin were able to post respectable numbers into their late thirties.  But, all three of them missed significant time.

So, here’s the conclusion.  Each year that goes by, it gets tougher for Derek Jeter to produce another great year.  His numbers  might not decline, but he may find that he’s not able to stay on the field.

I’m not wishing ill on Derek Jeter.  I’ve come to respect him for his accomplishments on the field and (now that I’m a dad) for being a role model off the field.  But, the simple truth is this is very likely Derek Jeter’s last great season.  So, whether you’re a Yankee fan or not, take time to enjoy Jeter now.

What Makes A Grown Man Cry? Click Here & Find out!

16 Aug

So what is it exactly that will make a grown man cry?  And I’m not talking some kind of metrosexual, new age sensitive guy, I’m talking a New York guy’s guy.  You know the type.  Listens to a LOT of sports talk radio.   And there’s your clue.

New York’s top sports talk combo broke up today after 19 years together.  That’s right, Mike and The Mad Dog have been reduced to just Mike.  The Dog, Chris Russo, has decided to leave the show.

Mike Francesa hosted the show solo today, which featured a LONG opening monologue from Francesa about what the show has meant to him, a call in from The Dog and then hours of calls from loyal listeners.

Many of the callers were pretty distressed.  One guy admitted that he wasn’t ashamed to admit he had “shed tears” when Chris Russo did while talking to his now former co-host.  Seems that for some the connection to Mike and The Dog was much more intense than mine to them.

For the past 19 years, I’ve listened to Mike and Chris on and off.  Lately, mostly off.  Truth be told, it’s Mike who’s most soured me on the show.  Years ago, I really enjoyed him.  When he was starting out as just another stats nerd, I rooted for him big time.  Over the years though, he’s either grown more pompous or I’ve just been exposed to more of him.  It’s really brought my opinion of him way down to the point now where it’s not surprising to hear me referring to him as a “blowhard”.  All that said, I still really respect his sports knowledge.

As for Chris, I think I’ve had the opposite experience with him.  When he first started out with Mike and for many years afterwards, I just couldn’t stomach him.  It seemed like he was just doing a bad Jerry Lewis impression to me and in later years he just seemed too eager to kiss Mike’s ring.  Somewhere along the line, someone gave me one of Mad Dog’s books and I really enjoyed it and also gained a new respect for his knowledge of sports.

So, clearly these two men brought a lot of enjoyment into my sports hungry life.  I wish them both well.  But, I’m not crying over it.

I understand radio is a very personal medium where the connection between the hosts and their listeners can really deepen over time.  Still, I’m not crying over it.

I’m a guy who sees nothing at all wrong with a man crying.  Despite this, for some reason, I don’t cry easily.  Whether it’s society or whatever, most guys don’t or at least won’t admit to crying easily. 

So, being an enlightened kind of guy, when some guy admits crying, it’s usually not a negative in my book.

Until today…. The caller who called in to Mike today and admitted crying along with Chris (whose tears I completely understand, after all he’s leaving his home of two decades and that’ll get you misty) reminded me of an old SNL skit.  William Shatner was guest hosting and the skit had him appearing at a Trekkie Convention.  After listening to all kinds of lame and tedious question about every minute aspect of the show, Shatner in the skit completely loses it.  Finally, in exasperation, he tells the Trekkies to “get a life”.

Good advice for all those teary-eyed Mike & The Mad Dog Listeners today.  Save your real man tears for the birth of your children, the passing of your parents and your wife telling you she’s with child.

PS – Hear Mike & Chris together for the last time.  Click on the link below, but keep the tissues nearby!

http://www.wfan.com/topic/play_window.php?audioType=Episode&audioId=2830249

 

Enough Talking! Two More Debates!

14 Mar
Like two old lovers who just can’t quit each other no matter how wrong they are together, Hillary and Barack are at it again.  America’s favorite duet team will soon be hitting the stage and singing the same old crowdpleasers.
Heard on the way home tonight that there may be two more debates between Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama.  Why?  What exactly are we supposed to find out that we don’t already know?  Normally, I love debates but really what are we searching for?  Is it the next President or best debater?  We might as well throw in a swimsuit competition while we’re at it!

Now that I mention it, let these images soak in their for awhile:

Go to fullsize image 

 (And just be happy I didn’t find any bikini pics of Sen. McCain)

If you’re Barack Obama why would you ever agree to debating Hillary Clinton again?  You’ve proven you can hold you’re own.  You’ve got a basically insurmountable delegate lead and you’ve won most of the primaries & caucuses.  More debates only means more risk to the Obama campaign.

 I guess the Obama people are agreeing to move forward with it because they’re worried about the backlash if they don’t agree to more debates given how close the race is.  My gut tells me the risk is bigger of a big debate gaffe than people turning on Barack Obama for refusing yet two more debates.

If I were advising Senator Obama (and clearly he’s not asking my opinion YET!), I’d tell him to skip the debates.  Then, I’d go to the campaign’s key spinmiesters and come up with some kind of story about why we’d said no.  I think it would probably be something along the lines of there already being 20 debates and now being busy taking our campaign directly to the people so we can hear what they want/expect from us when we win the White House.

Not bad spinning?  Right?  And that’s just off the top of my head!  Imagine what someone whose expertise is spin and with some time to think up a strategy would come up with.  The Obama campaign could completely avoid the risk more debates against Senator Clinton poses.  A risk that’s compounded by the fact that after the SNL skits the moderators will be lined up to play gotcha with Obama just to prove they’re not biased against him.

Go to fullsize image

It just keeps getting more interesting… And much better than SNL.